Article 43021 of comp.sys.cbm:
Xref: undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca comp.sys.cbm:43021
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Path: undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!csbruce
From: csbruce@ccnga.uwaterloo.ca (Craig Bruce)
Subject: Re: CMD Accelerator
Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner)
Message-ID: <DFvpF4.159@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 15:23:28 GMT
References: <44pil0$p7q@news.paonline.com>
Nntp-Posting-Host: ccnga.uwaterloo.ca
Organization: University of Waterloo, Canada (eh!)

Doug Cotton  <cmd-doug@genie.geis.com> writes:

>We've looked at what would be required to switch from the 65C02S to the 
>65C816S, and determined that this can be done for a reasonable cost 
>difference. The remainder of the specifications will remain the same, but 
>we will make memory expansion possible without having to modify the units.

Just a random thought, but if you could somehow sneak an 80-column chip into
the design, then what you would end up with is the _Ultimate Commodore
Machine_.  There probably wouldn't be a need to design a new accelerator for
the C128, since all that the C128 would have over the accelerated C64 would
be an 80-column chip and more keys on the keyboard.  Granted, existing
software wouldn't be able to use it (unless it worked the same as the C128's
80-column chip when in C64 more), but existing software also couldn't use
the 16-bit mode of the 65816 or the >64K memory ("in for a penny...").

Keep on Hackin'!

-Craig Bruce
csbruce@ccnga.uwaterloo.ca
Capt. Kirk: "I have a plan, Mr. Spock..."
Mr. Spock:  "I'm all ears, Captain..."                    --?


